What do you mean, you're uncertain?: the interpretation of cue words and rising intonation in dialogue
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper investigates how rising intonation affects the interpretation of cue words in dialogue. Both cue words and rising intonation express a range of speaker attitudes like uncertainty and surprise. However, it is unclear how the perception of these attitudes relates to dialogue structure and belief co-ordination. Perception experiment results suggest that rises reflect difficulty integrating new information rather than signaling a lack of credibility. This leads to a general analysis of rising intonation as signaling that the current question under discussion is unresolved. However, the interaction with cue word semantics restricts how much their interpretation can vary with prosody.
منابع مشابه
On the Intonation of Mono- and Di-Syllabic Words within the Discourse Framework of Conversational Games
Recent studies on the analysis of intonational function examine a r a n ~ of materials from cue phrases in monologue (Litman and Hirschberg, 1990) and dialogue (Hirschberg and Litman, 1987; Hockey, 1991) to longer utterances in both monologue and dialogue (McLemore, 1991). Results match specific intonational tunes to certain discourse functions which are more or less well defined. Although thes...
متن کاملDissertation Proposal Dialogue Glue: Cue Words and Prosody
This dissertation is about how semantics, pragmatics and speech prosody conspire to glue a dialogue together. This proposal focuses on the meaning and use of cue words. This set of discourse markers include backchannels like uh-huh and okay , agreements like right , and questioning particles like really . Understanding these sorts of markers is important because they indicate both when things a...
متن کاملAffirmative Cue Words in Task-Oriented Dialogue
We present a series of studies of affirmative cue words—a family of cue words such as “okay” or “alright" that speakers use frequently in conversation. These words pose a challenge for spoken dialogue systems because of their ambiguity: They may be used for agreeing with what the interlocutor has said, indicating continued attention, or for cueing the start of a new topic, among other meanings....
متن کاملIt Ain’t What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety – Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of ‘systems thinking.’
متن کاملin Foundations of Speech Act Theory
Like Humpty Dumpty, many philosophers take pride in saying what they mean and meaning what they say. Literalism does have its virtues, like when you're drawing up a contract or programming a computer, but generally we prefer to speak loosely and leave a lot to inference. Language works far more efficiently that way. Two Kinds of Looseness It helps if you can rely on people not to take you too l...
متن کامل